Iyobinte Pusthakam
By Lt Col D
Purushothaman Pillay (Retd)
This
insipid, amateurish period movie is an utterly disappointing, soulless,
self-indulgent, lavishly mounted but ineptly directed Amal Neerad film; which
is magnanimously being touted by the media, especially online, as a cult
classic.
Making
a period film is not a joke, but then one is not also allowed to make a joke of
a period film either. This movie did meticulously tick off all the right boxes
for all those clichéd must haves in a period movie; starting with a few vintage
cars, a Union Jack, a small number of white backpackers masquerading as Burra
Sahibs, a British Bungalow, an isolated hillock without electric posts, a
palanquin stretchered by slaves, pastel lacy parasols for the Memsahibs, the
occasional swarthy bleeding backs mercilessly lashed with leather whips,
historical maps, a retractable monocular, antiquated firearms, curved daggers,
steel sabres, some faux antique bric-a-brac strewn in a parlor with a central
fireplace, a couple of characters donning round Gandhi glass frames, characters
with beards and twirled mustaches, wearing Battle Dress Serge uniform breeches,
cotswool shirts with suspenders, in riding boots and a few customary horses.
But did that make it a convincing period film. Absolutely not.
Amal
Neerad’s attempt at aestheticization of violence, following the Quentin
Tarantino neo-noir school of film-making, was a failed effort to wallow in
sybaritic splendor. It was at best a self-indulgent exercise, to satiate the
cinematographer in him, to frame his shots in apt and exotic locations, which
would serve as springboards, for him to capture scenes graphically and make the
look and feel, visually opulent. This conspicuous bias towards visual appeal,
robbed the rich story of its soul. I would never fault the setting and construct
of the story, it is the direction given by the helmsman, which doomed its
destiny.
I
was an innocent victim of my curiosity, which had led me to visit the Wikipedia
page of this film, from where I was ushered to a few links of reviews available
online, that proclaimed it as a classic motion picture. For instance, Filmibeat.com
calls it "Amal Neerad's painting with a camera....One of the bravest
attempts of Malayalam cinema in recent times.....a complete visual treat.....the
best ever visual experience of Mollywood". The Nowrunning web portal
describes the movie as 'At once a contemplative and strapping work of art,
'Iyobinte Pusthakam' is the best Malayalam film as yet, to have hit the screens
this year!', on reading such and other similar reviews, repeatedly cloning the
same sentiments online, one is tempted to take the plunge, expecting an
unprecedented cinematic experience. Coming as it is, in a year which saw
beautiful heartwarming stories like "1983", "How Old Are
You" and "Bangalore Days", one tends to believe such hype and
get sucked through those turnstiles.
All
any lover of cinema expects, especially when acclaimed critics extol movies, is
to experience a coherent, well-told, soulful story that is skillfully narrated
by the chosen characters. However, sadly that was not the case with this film.
One comes away exhausted by the meaninglessness of the blood-soaked violence,
in a bid to bring a hasty closure to the story. The 2 hour 40 minute murderous ordeal
leaves only the two of the main protagonists standing, as the rest of the cast
end up as spangled corpses, littering the green slopes of the Munnar woods, all
eliminated with increasing degrees of cruelty and gore.
There
is hardly anything worthy of review really, even that overhyped buzz around the
music and background score of the movie, provided by an unknown debutant duo,
is exaggerated. I found the acoustics, instead of aiding the flow of the
narrative, often imposed an unaccustomed loudness that overwhelmed scenes, that
otherwise needed to be handled with more subtle tonal timbre. The songs, many
of which were unwanted and misplaced, looked like retro music videos of the
90s, which would do MTV proud. Even the choice of costumes were limited, the
characters pretty much walked the whole film in the same get-up. At other times
it was inexplicably ludicrous, for instance, one is left baffled as to why the
character of Martha, a supposed sorceress played by Isha Sharvani, the lonely daughter
of a tribal woman, who was disenfranchised while she was in the womb, is
walking around in Western clothes, just because she has fair skin, inherited
from her British father, who had died even before she was born.
Having
said all of the foregoing, the characters of Lal; as Iyobe the penitent
patriarch; Jayasurya, as Angur Rawther, the crafty usurper; and charming Fahadh
Faasil, as Aloshy the rebellious soldier turned revolutionary, continue to
linger on in our minds, despite all that mayhem. This is not a family film,
which one would take the young ones along, to watch. Hence, if I was adequately
warned, it is one of those films that I would have preferred to wait for the
DVD to watch it in private.
I
am positive that the make believe marketing strategies, gimmicks and hyperbole
supported by slick image-intensive trailers, which look very convincing and
nice on social media in their abbreviated avatars; will ensure that this movie
will draw the crowds in droves and they will rake in the moolah, to be deemed a
hit in due course. But I hope the immensely talented National Award winner Amal
Neerad, would give us a better movie the next time round.
I
would rate it a 2 on 5 at the most, that too, when in a very generous mood.